Seriously, do Democrat voters really believe Nancy Pelosi gives a whit about then?
---
Pelosi boasting that she'll be giving President Trump a headache for the next two years made me think of Br'er Rabbit 'laffing' as he convinced Br'er Fox and Br'er Bear the worst thing they could do to him was throw him into the "brier patch". Pelosi may voluntarily step away from the Speaker's role..She's never had to compromise to get a bill passed, and she won't have a way to overrule a Trump veto...nor has she ever negotiated with a person with real negotiating skills.
Pelosi boasting that she'll be giving President Trump a headache for the next two years made me think of Br'er Rabbit 'laffing' as he convinced Br'er Fox and Br'er Bear the worst thing they could do to him was throw him into the "brier patch". Pelosi may voluntarily step away from the Speaker's role..She's never had to compromise to get a bill passed, and she won't have a way to overrule a Trump veto...nor has she ever negotiated with a person with real negotiating skills.
---
Looks like the Greg Gutfield's analysis of Democrat voters having to ignore so.much in order to vote for their candidates his another "home run"..#MeToo target Keith Ellison won his race as the Minnesota Attorney General..
Looks like the Greg Gutfield's analysis of Democrat voters having to ignore so.much in order to vote for their candidates his another "home run"..#MeToo target Keith Ellison won his race as the Minnesota Attorney General..
---
Online headline/story: "The aftershock from Hillary Clinton’s defeat has finally arrived * The aftershock from Hillary Clinton’s defeat has been two years in coming, but on Tuesday night it arrived, as legions of women were elected to Congress and statehouses across the country." -- Aftershock? It's more like women who are real women looking good compared to what Hellary defined herself as being one. Seriously, though, what we are seeing is the effect of the #MeToo movement making men gun shy about being falsely accused of improprieties and being "convicted" by the media, and having their and their families lives ruined.
Online headline/story: "The aftershock from Hillary Clinton’s defeat has finally arrived * The aftershock from Hillary Clinton’s defeat has been two years in coming, but on Tuesday night it arrived, as legions of women were elected to Congress and statehouses across the country." -- Aftershock? It's more like women who are real women looking good compared to what Hellary defined herself as being one. Seriously, though, what we are seeing is the effect of the #MeToo movement making men gun shy about being falsely accused of improprieties and being "convicted" by the media, and having their and their families lives ruined.
---
Trump really took it to the MSM-13 at his press succession yesterday. One CNN "reporter" probably wished he had a gender re-assignment surgery before he stood up.
Trump really took it to the MSM-13 at his press succession yesterday. One CNN "reporter" probably wished he had a gender re-assignment surgery before he stood up.
---
HuffPOOPOO headline: "White House revokes CNN reporter Jim Acosta's credentials after argument with Trump" -- Trump is a maestro...he played Acosta like a Strad... no, it was actually more like Charlie Daniels, then Charlie Daniels handing his fiddle over to The Who's Pete Townsend to smash it on Acosta! Hey Charlie Daniels.. send me your bill for a replacement fiddle...
HuffPOOPOO headline: "White House revokes CNN reporter Jim Acosta's credentials after argument with Trump" -- Trump is a maestro...he played Acosta like a Strad... no, it was actually more like Charlie Daniels, then Charlie Daniels handing his fiddle over to The Who's Pete Townsend to smash it on Acosta! Hey Charlie Daniels.. send me your bill for a replacement fiddle...
---
You know, when Pelosi talks about creating good paying jobs, the only jobs she mentions are taxpayer funded jobs. She has no clue that good private sector jobs are necessary FIRST to create tax revenues to fund those taxpayer funded jobs.
You know, when Pelosi talks about creating good paying jobs, the only jobs she mentions are taxpayer funded jobs. She has no clue that good private sector jobs are necessary FIRST to create tax revenues to fund those taxpayer funded jobs.
---
Does Pelosi just feel she can talk reverently about her oath to honor and defend our Constitution, yet fight every effort conservatives make to defend our borders and citizens?
Does Pelosi just feel she can talk reverently about her oath to honor and defend our Constitution, yet fight every effort conservatives make to defend our borders and citizens?
---
How does Nancy Pelosi mention Gavin Newsome won the California Governor's race...and not mention he's her nephew?
How does Nancy Pelosi mention Gavin Newsome won the California Governor's race...and not mention he's her nephew?
---
Talk about hypocrisy... did you see Obama rush to GA and FL to get into 'photo ops' with Abrams and Gillum, but scrambled to dig his way out of photo ops with Farrakhan.
Talk about hypocrisy... did you see Obama rush to GA and FL to get into 'photo ops' with Abrams and Gillum, but scrambled to dig his way out of photo ops with Farrakhan.
---
Trump put to rest an Obama resurgence being the way to beat Trump in 2020. The pair squared off in three major races..Governorships in GA and FL, and the Senate race in FL. Final score: Trump 3, Obama 0.
Trump put to rest an Obama resurgence being the way to beat Trump in 2020. The pair squared off in three major races..Governorships in GA and FL, and the Senate race in FL. Final score: Trump 3, Obama 0.
---
For the next two years, if Pelosi retains the Speaker title, she and her 'bi-partisan' claims will be on trial. When her Dems were the House minority, her "compromise..who me? policy was quite evident", and without Compromise, this is no "bi-partisan" effort.
For the next two years, if Pelosi retains the Speaker title, she and her 'bi-partisan' claims will be on trial. When her Dems were the House minority, her "compromise..who me? policy was quite evident", and without Compromise, this is no "bi-partisan" effort.
---
When you think about it, the Democrats finished Tuesday with DRIED egg on their faces..in Obama's first midterm election, voters threw out 63 Democrats from the House and 6 from the Senate compared to voters putting back 30-something +/- Tuesday in the House plus actually losing some in the Senate. As far as usual midterm elections go, this was more of a RED-Letter Day than a Blue Wave.
When you think about it, the Democrats finished Tuesday with DRIED egg on their faces..in Obama's first midterm election, voters threw out 63 Democrats from the House and 6 from the Senate compared to voters putting back 30-something +/- Tuesday in the House plus actually losing some in the Senate. As far as usual midterm elections go, this was more of a RED-Letter Day than a Blue Wave.
---
Georgia voters should demand more from our legislature than allow them to put ..basically... undiscussed "referendums/amendments" at the n]end of the ballot with rather ambiguous explanations as to who is, and how they are effected throughout the state. What I do know is that if the casino pushers get their wish, casino patrons can get mimosas on Sunday mornings during Church services..
Georgia voters should demand more from our legislature than allow them to put ..basically... undiscussed "referendums/amendments" at the n]end of the ballot with rather ambiguous explanations as to who is, and how they are effected throughout the state. What I do know is that if the casino pushers get their wish, casino patrons can get mimosas on Sunday mornings during Church services..
---
From the "defies logic" department - WRBL 3 "headLIE": "Kemp, Abrams race could lead to runoff" -- Stacey Abrams doesn't want to conceded until every vote is counted.. There are 22,000 provisional ballots and 3,000 "outstanding" (whatever these are) ballots so basically 25,000 votes to be verified.. Abrams is DOWN 62,881 votes. She would have to get a NET GAIN of 23,783 votes (in other words, of the 25,000 votes, Kemp can get no more than 608 votes to push the Abrams amount within the "recount" parameters, and since she needs 25,632 votes out of 25,000 to be counted to get into a runoff.. that's not going to happen.. well, not unless CommonCRAP math is used. n a nutshell, Abrams needs 25,632 votes to get into a runoff, and there are only 25,000 possible votes to be counted.. CSU needs a new political science professor!
From the "defies logic" department - WRBL 3 "headLIE": "Kemp, Abrams race could lead to runoff" -- Stacey Abrams doesn't want to conceded until every vote is counted.. There are 22,000 provisional ballots and 3,000 "outstanding" (whatever these are) ballots so basically 25,000 votes to be verified.. Abrams is DOWN 62,881 votes. She would have to get a NET GAIN of 23,783 votes (in other words, of the 25,000 votes, Kemp can get no more than 608 votes to push the Abrams amount within the "recount" parameters, and since she needs 25,632 votes out of 25,000 to be counted to get into a runoff.. that's not going to happen.. well, not unless CommonCRAP math is used. n a nutshell, Abrams needs 25,632 votes to get into a runoff, and there are only 25,000 possible votes to be counted.. CSU needs a new political science professor!
---
We saw a sure sign that Hellary's declaration of not being civil has written her off for the future.. in her home town of Shicago, only 4 were shot and no one was killed on election day! Guess it was a "silent protest" against being uncivil.
We saw a sure sign that Hellary's declaration of not being civil has written her off for the future.. in her home town of Shicago, only 4 were shot and no one was killed on election day! Guess it was a "silent protest" against being uncivil.
---
Like Yogi Berra would say, "it ain't over 'til it's over" , but it's a little dramatic for Arizona not top declare Martha McSally the winner. With 99% of the vote counted, McSally has a 17,073 margin... 1%..and 15 of the total cast votes is about 17,300 +/-. McSally will only have to get about 115 of those 17,300 ballots to win...
Like Yogi Berra would say, "it ain't over 'til it's over" , but it's a little dramatic for Arizona not top declare Martha McSally the winner. With 99% of the vote counted, McSally has a 17,073 margin... 1%..and 15 of the total cast votes is about 17,300 +/-. McSally will only have to get about 115 of those 17,300 ballots to win...
---
Just mulling the latest SAT results recently published in the Columbus, GA area, and I remembered something that's not even mentioned anymore.. when the SAT results were "dumbed down"..When my generation took the SAT's, a "wrong answer" actually counted "against you".. Today, scores are determined basically on the number of questions answered correctly.. you answer all questions, get 75% right, and you basically get a 1200 score (75% of 1,600). "In the old days" we got credit for all your "correct answers" but got deductions for our "wrong" answers.. we had to analyze each question's 4 choices and choose to answer or not answer based on whether we thought we actually knew the answer. If you didn't answer, it was just not a "correct" answer, but if we answered it wrongly, you got penalized.. we learned that when faced with not being able to eliminate at least two of the questions options as definitely wrong, we might fare better at recognizing NOT to guess between the other two options unless you felt strongly about one over the other.
Just mulling the latest SAT results recently published in the Columbus, GA area, and I remembered something that's not even mentioned anymore.. when the SAT results were "dumbed down"..When my generation took the SAT's, a "wrong answer" actually counted "against you".. Today, scores are determined basically on the number of questions answered correctly.. you answer all questions, get 75% right, and you basically get a 1200 score (75% of 1,600). "In the old days" we got credit for all your "correct answers" but got deductions for our "wrong" answers.. we had to analyze each question's 4 choices and choose to answer or not answer based on whether we thought we actually knew the answer. If you didn't answer, it was just not a "correct" answer, but if we answered it wrongly, you got penalized.. we learned that when faced with not being able to eliminate at least two of the questions options as definitely wrong, we might fare better at recognizing NOT to guess between the other two options unless you felt strongly about one over the other.
---
It's sad that Jeff Sessions is gone.. but it had to be done.. we hadn't seen honor and integrity in that post in years but circumstances just called for it.
It's sad that Jeff Sessions is gone.. but it had to be done.. we hadn't seen honor and integrity in that post in years but circumstances just called for it.
---
From the "now we really know" department - Online headline/story: "Fans blame Beyoncé for Beto O’Rourke’s loss to Ted Cruz * She was a Bey late and a dollar short. * Fans are roasting Beyoncé for her 11th-hour endorsement of Senate hopeful Beto O’Rourke on Tuesday, with some even blaming her for the Texas Democrat’s loss to Sen. Ted Cruz. * The Houston-born songstress urged her fans to get out and vote for O’Rourke, posting photos on Instagram of herself dressed in all black and wearing a matching “Beto for Senate” cap." -- Well, after spending $70,000,000.00 and not not winning, I guess you do have point "finger of blame" at someone other than the real reason..
From the "now we really know" department - Online headline/story: "Fans blame Beyoncé for Beto O’Rourke’s loss to Ted Cruz * She was a Bey late and a dollar short. * Fans are roasting Beyoncé for her 11th-hour endorsement of Senate hopeful Beto O’Rourke on Tuesday, with some even blaming her for the Texas Democrat’s loss to Sen. Ted Cruz. * The Houston-born songstress urged her fans to get out and vote for O’Rourke, posting photos on Instagram of herself dressed in all black and wearing a matching “Beto for Senate” cap." -- Well, after spending $70,000,000.00 and not not winning, I guess you do have point "finger of blame" at someone other than the real reason..
---
Another bar shooting happened in California... it was a "country" night, and judging from pictures of the patron's, the "Regan/Bush, Blackrifle Coffee, and other patriotic and conservative wear, and mass attendance of nearby Christian college students. it'll be hard for even MSM-13 to paint this as a "deranged Trump supporter". The count of the dead is up to 13 now.. Pray the number stops growing.
Another bar shooting happened in California... it was a "country" night, and judging from pictures of the patron's, the "Regan/Bush, Blackrifle Coffee, and other patriotic and conservative wear, and mass attendance of nearby Christian college students. it'll be hard for even MSM-13 to paint this as a "deranged Trump supporter". The count of the dead is up to 13 now.. Pray the number stops growing.
---
M/C L-E headline: "City worker accused of theft by deception" -- Hmmm.. hey, this reminds me.. when will the rest of the forensic audits be completed and results published for taxpaying voters discernment?
M/C L-E headline: "City worker accused of theft by deception" -- Hmmm.. hey, this reminds me.. when will the rest of the forensic audits be completed and results published for taxpaying voters discernment?
---
M/C L-E headline/story: "Girl Scouts sue Boy Scouts over name change * The Girl Scouts of the United States of America filed a trademark infringement lawsuit Tuesday against the Boy Scouts of America for dropping the word “boy” from its flagship program in an effort to attract girls." -- Wow! I do believe the #MeToo movement has created an unintended consequence for liberals... disregard for political incorrectness. In this day of gender equality, and self declaration of gender, it looks like the Girl Scouts have decide to be intolerant of the Boy Scouts dropping "boy" from it's business name to show it is now more "all inclusive".. I guess the Girl Scouts don't really believe in the goose/gander theory and are not going to allow boys into the Girl Scouts..
M/C L-E headline/story: "Girl Scouts sue Boy Scouts over name change * The Girl Scouts of the United States of America filed a trademark infringement lawsuit Tuesday against the Boy Scouts of America for dropping the word “boy” from its flagship program in an effort to attract girls." -- Wow! I do believe the #MeToo movement has created an unintended consequence for liberals... disregard for political incorrectness. In this day of gender equality, and self declaration of gender, it looks like the Girl Scouts have decide to be intolerant of the Boy Scouts dropping "boy" from it's business name to show it is now more "all inclusive".. I guess the Girl Scouts don't really believe in the goose/gander theory and are not going to allow boys into the Girl Scouts..
No comments:
Post a Comment
Am opening up this blog for reader comments. Post responsibly, and identify yourself so others know who is saying what.
Some people like to "snipe" while concealed in the shadows.. those people are not worthy of having their comments addressed nor published.
For info sake.. recently, viewer numbers have eclipsed 29,000 on six continents (all but Antarctica).
Am foregoing advertising to bring you clutter free news and opinion.