Thanks to a fellow BCer for this adaptation: In the vernacular of TV advertising, in 2008 we had 'an election that lasted over 4 hours', and like socialist HELL-thSCare Bill, it's taken 2 years to schedule corrective surgery.
---
With potUS Imam-a's scathing chastisement of Latino voters, he has proven he is not "the healer". "the ONE", nor "the man of all the people" he and the mainstream media claim he is.
---
From the "what's wrong with this picture" department - From an L-E story: "
Spokesperson Bill Sutley said Aramark is the sole caterer for university events and they applied for a liquor license so they could offer alcoholic beverages at events for university donors at places like CSU’s Cunningham Center" -- Not only is a liquor license being established on a college campus, but did you notice that part about Aramark being 'the sole caterer for university events"? Some community support and partnership program..NOT.
---
If potUS Imam-a talked as tough about terrorism and illegal aliens as he does about the Republicans, there would be World Peace today.
---
Online headline: "'Chiclone' Wreaks Havoc on Chicago and Midwest " -- Ooops, my bad. Thought the press had coined a new nickname for Rahm Emanuel.
---
With the length of the Nike/Blazers scandal at the Parks&Rec Department, and with no one 'blowing the whistle' until the audit found the problem, is there anyone at the P&R Department who doesn't deserve scrutiny about their ongoing employment?
---
With the recent expose of the grants directed by Congressman Bishop which paid the salaries of his stepdaughter and her husband, and the plethora of scholarship monies that went to his family and friends, a vote for Bishop is a vote of acceptance of Congressional abuse of tax dollars.
---
L-E headline: "Georgia gubernatorial race: Barnes stresses education during visit to Columbus" -- Aside from the fact he had the opportunity to "stress education" when he WAS governor, but only 'stressed" the teachers, why would anyone 'feel', much less THINK, King Roy deserved another chance?
---
L-E headline: "Ruling strikes down part of Arizona Voter ID law" -- The 26th Amendment of the United States reads: "The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age." -- If the right to vote is limited to US citizens, how can a judge deny a state the ability to require proof of citizenship to register to vote? How can a city or state abridge the requirement to allow non-citizens a vote on any issue?
-------------------------------------