Online quote source: "“This year, as we celebrate the anniversary of America's independence, please remember the symbols that are sacred to this country. Fly Old Glory high and show your respect and admiration for this great nation and the values we hold dear.” - Kenny Marchant - R-24 Texas. -- Hmmm this will distinguish "us" from the Democrats...

---
You know, when the Mosqued Man states he's going to do whatever he can... whatever he can get away with using his phone and pen.... then he has vacated his position as president and appointed himself as the ruler. A military coupe should be initiated.

---
Online story: "WASHINGTON — When President Obama travels to Texas next week, he will come as close as he has been in weeks to the rapidly escalating border crisis that has left thousands of unaccompanied children in shelters and spurred angry protests throughout the country. * despite being battered on all sides on the issue, a White House spokesman said Thursday that the president had no intention of visiting the border for a firsthand look at the scene of what he has called a humanitarian crisis." -- Hmmmm.. guess the Man of Steal is the only world leader who won't cross a line he's drawn in the sand.

---

You know, I've been thinking about how Mayor Obamalinson has taken it on her own to shutdown entry to the Citizens Service Center except for one door where she has ordered citizens, law abiding citizens, to be searched, and if found to be armed, to ban their admittance, maybe even confiscate their legally carried guns. In fact , since the state's laws allow law abiding citizens with properly acquired permits to have access to public buildings, isn't searching them without a warrant or probable cause Illegal?

---

Online story: "The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), a federal agency tasked with enforcing workplace discrimination laws, is suing a private American business for firing a group of Hispanic and Asian employees over their inability to speak English at work, claiming that the English-language requirement in a U.S. business constitutes “discrimination.” * the government is accusing Wisconsin Plastics, Inc. of violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on “national origin.” The government argues this includes the “linguistic characteristics of a national origin group.” * That’s ludicrous and an overreaching of government,” Irene Garcia, blog editor and Spanish media liaison for Judicial Watch told CNSNews.com. “If you are a private company in the United States, you should be able to require your employees to speak English.” -- Good grief.. if the EEOC wants to stand up nor the rights of the citizens of this country, it should be filing suits against the Mosqued Man for his inability to speak the truth..... in any language!

---

It's not that Democrats just wage war on women, its that Democrats want to label all single women monolithic voters. It's ridiculous that Democrats presume all single women are promiscuous, irresponsible, and incapable.

---

You know, since GM wanted to name a woman to be in charge of handling all the horrific PR that's filling the headlines, GM missed the ideal choice..Hillary... just think how she would have fended off Congressional inquiries... "I don't RECALL ... or "What difference does it make?".

---

Yesterday, I passed along the "new jobs created" last month figure of 281,000. Today, I have the 1st Time Unemployment figures. The 1st Time Unemployment numbers are: .315,000 new ones...that sorta trumps the created jobs number, especially considering they are summer jobs. At 315K, 1st Time Unemployment applications extend out to over 16 MILLION on an annual basis.

---

What's the Wall Street excitement with the "jobs created/1st Time benefits applicants"? When more people are filing for benefits from jobs lost, how can it be good that there were 34,000 less jobs filled?

---

Online story: "The Georgia Public Service Commission is planning to abandon an initiative imposing a $5 monthly fee on low-income Georgians for basic cellphones provided through a federal program." -- Sadly, I agree that the $5.00 fee is not to be collected... otherwise, "we" would just be taxed another $60.00 a year on top of what "we" are being taxed to pay for other people's "free" o-Phones.

---

Latest from barackobama.com: ' Hal -- When the Supreme Court's Hobby Lobby ruling came down on Monday, I was speechless. All I could think about was what this ruling means for American families across the country whose employers now have a say in whether their birth control is covered by their insurance." -- "speechless"? All I've heard are "speeches".. speeches about why it's not OK for American businesses to decide what it provides to its employees, and yet it's OK for the government to decide what businesses have to provide.

---

LIV's L-E "soundoff": "Conservative Christians will suffer hell’s torments for their countless unchristian behaviors. Mother Teresa helped the poor, the sick, the lepers and the dying in the worst slums of Calcutta. What do you do?" -- Hmmm What did conservative Christians do... hmmm, how about dug deep in their OWN pockets and made donations to support and allow Mother Teresa's ministry reach out into some of the worst areas in the world. My question to the LIV who wrote this is: How much did you send Mother Teresa's ministry?

---

LIV's L-E "soundoff": "This month, while nobody was watching, House Republicans voted to extend many corporate subsidies and tax breaks amounting to $75 billion over 10 years. But we can’t afford food stamps and unemployment benefits?" -- Hmmm.. bet this LIV has never considered that a tax reduction to businesses will not only keep their employees out of the unemployment cycle, but boost taxes that pay for this LIV's government handouts.

---

The founding fathers are rolling over in their graves at how certain people and groups have interpreted their wording in the Declaration of Independence: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." The Man of Steal and the DemocRATic Party believe they are the providers of Life, Liberty and the GUARANTEE of Happiness.

---

In the L-E feature, "Looking back | Fifty years ago today, July 4, 1964, we are reminded of: "Wholesale lowering of racial bars in many Georgia cities was recorded Friday night, as quiet acceptance of the new civil rights law continued to be the dominant pattern. * The only major break in the pattern was a restaurant in Atlanta owned by segregationist Lester Maddox, a former candidate for lieutenant governor. * When three Negroes sought service, Maddox and a group of white persons turned them away with ax handles stored in a box near the front door of the restaurant." -- Hmmm.. seems as if the L-E has left out a particularly important detail.. Lester Maddox was a Democrat as were his friends, and the Democratic GA House elected him as Governor when Republican Bo Callaway didn't get a majority of the votes in the 1966 elections.

---

L-E story: "One of the five people convicted in the 2006 murder of Scottie Gillen is requesting the Georgia Supreme Court grant him a new trial under grounds the judge made a “reversible error” when he mentioned during jury selection that the crime occurred in Muscogee County * The Georgia Supreme Court will hear the case on Monday. Rouse’s attorney plans to argue for a new trial after he says Muscogee County Superior Court Judge Bobby Peters made a “reversible error” by telling prospective jurors during the jury selection process “that you will be hearing about a case, which is a murder case that happened in Muscogee County.” * “According to 17-8-5, a court’s comment on a fact to be proved by the State ‘shall be held by the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals to be error and the decision in the case reversed, and a new trial granted. …’ Because the jury began this trial having been told by the court that venue was in Muscogee County, Rouse must be granted a new trial.” -- This is one of the stupidest things I've heard for an appeal.. Why isn't it MANDATORY for a judge to qualify that the court's position is that the crime the jury is about to hear about is in its realm of authority to decide the results?